IN RE JANE DOE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A minor petitioned for judicial waiver of parental notice for termination of pregnancy. The trial court deferred ruling pending a mental health examination, violating the statutory 48-hour deadline. The court holds that the petition was automatically granted when the trial court failed to rule within 48 hours, and the minor is entitled to a certificate of judicial waiver.
The court holds that the trial court lacks authority to defer ruling on a waiver petition pending a psychological evaluation, and that the petition was automatically granted when the court failed to rule within 48 hours. The court also holds that while venue was improper because the minor resides in the Third District's jurisdiction, transfer is not required given the statute is non-jurisdictional and expeditious review is necessary.
[1] Emergency rules may be adopted by the court to address immediate procedural needs arising from legislative changes.
[2] A petition for court authorization to terminate the pregnancy of an unmarried minor must state specific grounds for waiving parental consent.
Previewing 2 of 6 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the trial court "shall rule, and issue written findings of fact and conclusions of law, within 48 hours after the petition is filed, except that the 48-hour limitation may be extended at the request of the minor."”
Establishes the mandatory statutory deadline for ruling on judicial waiver petitions, extendable only by the minor's request.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceA minor filed a petition for judicial waiver of parental notice for termination of pregnancy in the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit. The trial court did …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Petition For Writ Of Mandamus cases and more on FLexlaw
The minor appeals the trial court’s order deferring her petition for a judicial waiver of parental notice for termination of pregnancy, pending completion of a court-ordered mental health exam. Because no final order has been rendered, we treat the notice of appeal as a petition for a writ of mandamus, and the statute compels the automatic granting of the petition.
Pursuant to section 390.01114(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2010), the trial court “shall rule, and issue written findings of fact and conclusions of law, within 48 hours after the petition is filed, except that the 48-hour limitation may be extended at the request of the minor.” If the court does not rule within 48 hours, the petition is automatically granted, and the clerk must issue the minor a certificate indicating that the notice requirement is waived. Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.820(d)(3).
In this case, the trial court did not rule within 48 hours, and the record does not indicate that the minor consented to the extension of time. Neither the Rules of Juvenile Procedure nor section 390.01114 permits the trial court to defer ruling on a petition for judicial waiver pending a psychological evaluation of the minor. As such, the petition was automatically granted after the expiration of the initial 48-hour window. See In re A.S., 909 So.2d 524, 525 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Accordingly, we remand with instructions for the trial court to enter an order granting petitioner’s petition and for the clerk of the circuit court to issue a certificate of judicial waiver of notice to petitioner.
The record also reflects that petitioner is a resident of Miami-Dade County. Section 390.01114(4)(a) states that a minor may seek a judicial waiver in “any circuit court in a judicial circuit within the jurisdiction of the District Court of Appeal in which she resides.” The statute establishes the proper venue for these kinds of cases and is not jurisdictional. In re Doe 07-B, 973 So.2d 627, 629 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). Because petitioner resides in the jurisdiction of the Third District Court of Appeal, venue in the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit was not proper, and the trial court should have transferred the case to a circuit court within the proper appellate district. However, as the statute is not jurisdictional, and as expeditious review is required, we do not believe that transfer at this date is required or warranted.
Petition granted with instructions.
WARNER, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- In re A.S., 909 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)
- In re Jane DOE 07-B, 973 So. 2d 627 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)