JOHN D. PONDER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2011-03-02
No. 4D09-4230
POLEN, HAZOURI and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
56 So. 3d 92 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2011) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Anderson, 905 So.2d 111 (Fla.2005).

POLEN, HAZOURI and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • E. Qualcom Corp. v. Global Commerce Ctr. Ass'n, Inc., 59 So. 3d 347 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
    …g, the trial court granted a satisfaction of judgment. On remand, the trial court must vacate the satisfaction of judgment as the trial court was without jurisdiction to enter the satisfaction while this appeal was pending. See Spencer v. DiGiacomo, 56 So. 3d 92 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). Accordingly, we reverse the final summary judgment against Qualcom on its counterclaim; we reverse the partial summary judgment of foreclosure in favor of the Association; we order the trial court to vacate the satisfaction of…
  • Anne Marie Spencer v. Digiacomo, 62 So. 3d 1168 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
    …who has made the full payment. In the case of a civil action arising out of the provisions of this section, the prevailing party shall be entitled to attorney’s fees and costs.”). We recently reversed the underlying order in Spencer v. DiGiacomo, 56 So. 3d 92 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). Therefore, we must reverse the attorney’s fees order as well. See S & I Invs. v. Payless Flea Market, Inc., 40 So. 3d 48, 49 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“ Where a court awards prevailing party attorney’s fees and the underlying judgmen…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw