MARSHA J. PEADEN AND CLAUDIA FISCHER, APPELLANTS,
v.
ISLAND BREEZE, LLC, AN ALABAMA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AND DESTIN LAND AND TITLE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEES
MARSHA J. PEADEN AND CLAUDIA FISCHER, APPELLANTS,
ISLAND BREEZE, LLC, AN ALABAMA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AND DESTIN LAND AND TITLE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEES
58 So. 3d 309
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2011)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
We conclude that we lack jurisdiction to consider appellants’ contention that the trial court should have ruled on appellants’ motion to dismiss the complaint in inter-pleader filed by appellee Destín Land and Title, Inc. We conclude further, that appellants’ remaining issues are devoid of merit and, accordingly, affirm as to them.
DISMISSED IN PART and AFFIRMED IN PART.
WOLF, WEBSTER, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wright v. State, 161 So. 3d 442 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)…ANALYSIS Our review of a suppression order presents a mixed issue of law and fact, with deference given to findings of fact supported by competent, substantial evidence, while the application of law to the facts is reviewed de novo. State v. Perez, 58 So. 3d 309, 311 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). Here, the trial court made no oral or written findings; rather, it rendered an unela-borated order denying suppression of the first and third statements. Both the United States and Florida Constitutions provide that a pers…
-
State v. Figueroa, 139 So. 3d 365 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)…ed question of law and fact, [appellate courts] defer to its findings of historical facts, as long as they are supported by substantial, competent evidence,” but review de novo the legal determination that the suspect was in custody. State v. Perez, 58 So. 3d 309, 311 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011); see also Connor v. State, 803 So. 2d 598 (Fla.2001); Snead v. State, 913 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Duddles v. State, 845 So. 2d 939 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). When addressing the issue of whether a suspect is in custody, c…
-
D'Andre Bannister v. State, 132 So. 3d 267 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)…manner. See, e.g., Peterson v. State, 94 So. 3d 514, 528 (Fla.2012) (“While Jackson asked numerous questions concerning how Peterson committed the murder, the manner of their conversation does not show any type of pressure at all.”); State v. Perez, 58 So. 3d 309, 312 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (“The testimony also indicated the interview was conducted in a non-threatening manner and the tone was conversational, not confrontational.”). In this case, the evidence supports the trial court’s finding that neither dete…