GERALD LELIEVE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the defendant's motion for post-conviction relief was timely filed within the two-year period prescribed by rule 3.850(b).
Gerald Lelieve appealed the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief, which the trial court found to be untimely. Lelieve's direct appe…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Scoresheet Error cases and more on FLexlaw
Gerald Lelieve appeals the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court denied the motion as untimely filed. We reverse.
Pursuant to rule 3.850(b), an inmate has two years from the date on which a conviction and sentence become final within which to file a motion for post-conviction relief. Lelieve’s direct appeal became final for purposes of this rule when the mandate issued on May 29, 2009. He filed his motion on February 9, 2010. Thus, Le-lieve timely filed his motion.
Additionally, the State filed a response below arguing that the motion, if timely, should nevertheless be denied because it was alleging a scoresheet error, and rule 3.850 was not the proper mechanism for relief on a scoresheet error. Lelieve, however, is not complaining about a scoresheet error. He is alleging that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to several errors on the scoresheet, to wit, points for prior offenses which had been resolved as “no action.”
Reversed and Remanded.