MICHAEL SCHNEIDER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2011-05-06
No. 5D10-4
MONACO, C.J., SAWAYA and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
60 So. 3d 556 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2011) Caution
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See generally Jackson v. State, 979 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (explaining that evidence may be authenticated by appearance, content, substance, internal patterns, or other distinctive characteristics taken in conjunction with circumstances;, in addition, evidence may be authenticated either by using extrinsic evidence, or by showing that it meets requirements for self-authentication).

MONACO, C.J., SAWAYA and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Wilson v. State, 224 So. 3d 815 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)
    …. The trial court granted relief by amending the sentence to conform to the plea agreement, but it denied Appellant’s request to allow him to withdraw his plea based on Echeverria v. State, 949 So. 2d 331 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). Citing Pralle v. State, 60 So. 3d 556 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011), Appellant contends that the trial court was obligated to allow him to withdraw his plea. We disagree. Pralle neither approved nor disapproved the alternative remedy imposed here of amending the sentence to conform to the agreeme…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw