KEITH SHARPE, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
KEITH SHARPE, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
60 So. 3d 1101
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2011)
Caution
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.
WOLF, THOMAS, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Emmett Timothy COX v. State, 221 So. 3d 723 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)…ily waived the procedural requirements of section 775.084 and, with it, the State’s obligation to present evidence establishing that Cox qualified as a habitual felony offender.4 See Irving v. State, 627 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); White v. State, 60 So. 3d 1101 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). Moreover, and as the State correctly argues, Cox failed to satisfy the burden imposed on him when seeking to correct an illegal sentence under rule 3.800(a). Unlike a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850,5 a…
-
McCORMICK v. State, 186 So. 3d 1111 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)…he defendant who committed the predicate felony for his HVFO designation — another second-degree murder. , Because McCormick does not deny he committed the predicate felony, this claim is not cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) motion. Cf. White v. State, 60 So. 3d 1101, 1103 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (“[A] defendant’s contention that she- did not have the predicate felonies required, to support an’HFO designation is cognizable under a rule 3.800(a) claim if her entitlement to relief is clear from the face of the record.…
-
Rollins v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2020)