ROSITA R. MARTINEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY AND F.A. RICHARD & ASSOCIATES, APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 2011-05-13
Nos. 1D10-6350, 1D10-6353, 1D10-6357, 1D10-6364, 1D10-6365
LEWIS, CLARK, and ROWE, JJ., concur.
60 So. 3d 1155 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2011) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Appellant’s responses to this court’s January 7, 2011, order to show cause, and Appellees’ motions to dismiss, we conclude the order on appeal in each of these cases is a non-appealable, nonfinal order. See Fla. RApp. P. 9.180(b)(1). Accordingly, these appeals are DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

LEWIS, CLARK, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Mid-Continent Cas. Co. v. Royal Crane, LLC, 169 So. 3d 174 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)
    …Inc. v. Scott & Jobalia Constr. Co., 565 So. 2d 1346, 1347 (Fla.1990) (citation omitted and emphasis added). “Under this common law doctrine, one employer can ‘lend’ its employee to another ‘special employer.’” Fossett v. Se. Toyota Distribs., LLC, 60 So. 3d 1155, 1157-58 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).3 Nor did the third party complaint cast Cloutier as the employer of an independent contractor who actively participated in or interfered with the job to the extent that it directly influenced the manner in which the wor…
  • Baker v. Airguide Mfg., LLC, 151 So. 3d 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)
    …mployer and the employee; (2) the work being done at the time of the injury was essentially that of the special employer; and (3) the power to control the details of the work resided with the special employer.” Fossett v. Se. Toyota Distribs., LLC, 60 So. 3d 1155, 1158 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (quoting St. Lucie Falls Prop. Owners Ass’n v. Morelli, 956 So. 2d 1283, 1286 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)). In addition to the common law “borrowed servant” doctrine, section 440.11(2) of the Florida Statutes also extends statutor…
  • Pensacola Christian Coll. & Robert Maddox v. Joyanne Bruhn, 80 So. 3d 1046 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
    …vant’ doctrine.” [St. Lucie Falls Prop. Owners Ass’n v. Morelli, 956 So. 2d 1283, 1286 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) ]. Under this common law doctrine, one employer can “lend” its employee to another “special employer.” Fossett v. Se. Toyota Distribs., LLC., 60 So. 3d 1155, 1157-58 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (“A special employer qualifies as such where ‘(1) there was a contract for hire, either express or implied, between the special employer and the employee; (2) the [*1050] work being done at the time of the injury was ess…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw