THOMAS E. SKORAN, JR., APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
SEACOAST UTILITY AUTHORITY AND FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES, APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appealability Of Non-Final Orders cases and more on FLexlaw
Upon review of Appellant’s response to this court’s March 1, 2011, order to show cause, we DISMISS this appeal and cross-appeal without prejudice to the right to seek review upon entry of a final order. See Mintz v. Broward Corr. Inst., 800 So.2d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (holding order merely granting employer/earrier’s motion to dismiss is not an appealable final order); Truc v. Kimmins Corp., 889 So.2d 964, 964 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (dismissing, pursuant to Mintz, appeal of order granting employer/carrier’s motion to dismiss); see also Dedge v. Crosby, 914 So.2d 1055, 1056 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (order granting motion to dismiss with prejudice no more final than order granting motion to dismiss without prejudice).
DISMISSED.
BENTON, C.J., WEBSTER, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fountain v. PMI Emp. Leasing & Comprehensive Ins. Solutions, Inc., 77 So. 3d 252 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)…upon entry of a final order. See Mintz v. Broward Corr. Inst., 800 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (holding order merely granting employer/earrier’s motion to dismiss is not an appealable final order); see also, e.g., Skoran v. Seacoast Util. Auth., 60 So. 3d 1174 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Boladares v. Olemshoe Corp., 28 So. 3d 176 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010); Truc v. Kimmins Corp., 889 So. 2d 964, 964 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). DISMISSED. WETHERELL, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Mintz v. Broward Corr. Inst. & State of Fla., 800 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)
- Wilson v. State, 800 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)
- Dep't OF Child. & Families v. In the Interest of L. R., 914 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)
- Floyd v. Burnham, 889 So. 2d 964 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)
- Wilton Dedge v. Crosby, 914 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)