M.H.-R., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2011-05-20
No. 5D10-2108
GRIFFIN, PALMER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
61 So. 3d 483 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2011) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s determination that M.H.-R. was guilty of resisting a law enforcement officer without violence. See Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nevada, Humboldt County, 542 U.S. 177, 124 S.Ct. 2451, 159 L.Ed.2d 292 (2004) (individual may be required to provide his or her name to law enforcement officer where officer has initiated a valid Terry1 stop). However, we remand for a new disposition hearing (assuming the issue has not become moot) because of the inconsistencies between the trial court’s oral pronouncement and its written order as to the length of M.H.-R.’s curfew and probationary periods.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED

GRIFFIN, PALMER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • E.M. v. State, 155 So. 3d 1251 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed, See M.H.-R v. State, 61 So. 3d 483 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). DAMOORGIAN, C.J., TAYLOR and CONNER, JJ., concur.…
  • Henry v. Bank of Am. N.A. (Fla. 5th DCA 2022)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw