WANDA SWANSON MORTON, APPELLANT,
v.
JOHN J. MORTON, APPELLEE
WANDA SWANSON MORTON, APPELLANT,
JOHN J. MORTON, APPELLEE
102 So. 2d 41
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1958)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
It appearing that there was ample evidence, though conflicting, to support the findings and decree, we adhere to the elemental rule that on appeal the findings of a .chancellor based upon conflicting evidence will not be disturbed unless clearly shown by the appellant to be erroneous.
Affirmed.
STURGIS, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Roberts v. State, 142 So. 2d 152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962)…n 909.13, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. . Banks v. State, Fla.App.1961, 130 So. 2d 73; Asbey v. State, Fla.App.1958, 102 So. 2d 407; La Barbera v. State, Fla. 1953, 63 So. 2d 654. . Simmons v. State, Fla.App.1961, 132 So. 2d 235; Fryer v. State, Fla.App.1958, 102 So. 2d 41; Asbey v. State, supra; Collins v. State, Fla.1955, 83 So. 2d 6. . Artigas v. State, 140 Fla. 671, 192 So. 795; Brown v. State, 92 Fla. 592, 109 So. 627. . Rubinstein v. State, Fla.1951, 50 So. 2d 708; Pope v. State, 56 Fla. 81, 47 So. 487. . War…
-
Morgan v. State, 142 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)…s denied, defendant, on appeal, is charged with the burden of clearly demonstrating that the denial of the motion constitutes an abuse of discretion by the trial court. Simmons v. State, Fla.App.1961, 132 So. 2d 235 and Fryer v. State, Fla.App.1958, 102 So. 2d 41. Defendant has assumed that the report rendered was unfavorable; yet the record without dispute shows that the contents of the report had not been divulged. The trial court could have denied defendant’s request that a presentence investigation be m…
-
Ulysses Sutton v. State, 202 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967)…nt to, at any time before sentence, withdraw a plea of guilty, F.S. 909.13, F.S.A. The burden is cast upon the appellant to clearly show that the trial judge abused his discretion in not permitting the plea of guilty to be withdrawn. Fryer v. State, 102 So. 2d 41 (Fla.App. 1st, 1958). Under the facts presented in the case at bar we are convinced that [*590] there was no abuse of discretion in the decision of the trial judge in denying the motion to withdraw the plea of guilty. Appellant was permitted to chan…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence