LEON L. MORANT, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
LEON L. MORANT, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
62 So. 3d 667
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2011)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.
DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK, and CLARK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Maronda Homes v. Lakeview Reserve Homeowners Ass'n, Inc., 127 So. 3d 1258 (Fla. 2013)…developer, the association may institute, maintain, settle, or appeal actions ... on behalf of all members concerning matters of common interest to the members....”); see also Homeowner’s Ass’n of Overlook, Inc. v. Seabrooke Homeowners’ Ass’n, Inc., 62 So. 3d 667, 670 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). This includes improvements for which the association is responsible. See § 720.303(1). The general test for whether a party has breached the implied warranties of fitness and merchantability “is whether the premises meet or…
-
The Waterview Towers Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. City OF W. Palm Beach, 232 So. 3d 401 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017)…o resolve a controversy of common interest to all units.” Four Jay’s Const. Inc. v. Marina at Bluffs Condo. Ass’n, Inc., 846 So. 2d 555, 557 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); see generally Homeowner’s Ass’n of Overlook, Inc. v. Seabrooke Homeowners’ Ass’n, Inc., 62 So. 3d 667 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). Under the Declaration, the Association is responsible for the operation of the entire condominium. The commercial parcels are part of the condominium. While the commercial parcels are not “common elements,” because they are part…