STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
YVONNE MICHELLE COUSINS, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The State petitioned for a writ of certiorari to challenge a trial court's order modifying a completed criminal sentence to reflect a withhold of adjudication. The court granted the writ and quashed the trial court's order, holding that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to modify a sentence that had been completed years after its imposition.
The trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to modify Cousins' completed sentence. A trial court generally loses jurisdiction to modify or change a sentence 60 days after the sentence is imposed or becomes final, and certainly lacks jurisdiction to modify a legal sentence several years after it has been completed.
[1] A trial court loses jurisdiction to modify or change a sentence 60 days after the sentence is imposed or becomes final.
[2] A trial court lacks jurisdiction to modify a completed criminal sentence several years after it has been imposed.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“As a general matter, a trial court loses jurisdiction to modify or change a sentence 60 days after the sentence is imposed or becomes final.”
Establishes the general rule limiting trial court jurisdiction over completed sentences
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceYvonne Michelle Cousins was convicted of a crime and completed her sentence. Ten years later, Cousins sent a letter to the trial court requesting that…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Certificate Of Eligibility cases and more on FLexlaw
The State of Florida petitions this court for a writ of certiorari. We grant the writ and quash the trial court’s order which modified the completed criminal sentence of the respondent, Yvonne Cousins, to reflect a withhold of adjudication.
The trial court’s order was entered following a hearing on a letter it received from Cousins, which the court treated as a motion. In the letter, Cousins requested that her criminal history records be expunged or sealed. She explained that there were extenuating circumstances surrounding her conviction and that she had not been in trouble in the ten years since her conviction. Cousins also noted that she had secured employment as a security officer, but she would be in danger of losing that job if she could not obtain a security officer’s license from the Department of Agriculture. She advised that she could not obtain such a license unless her criminal record was expunged.
While the trial court held a hearing to consider Cousins’ request, it took no action on her motion because she could not provide a certificate of eligibility as required by section 943.0585, Florida Statutes.1 Instead, the trial court entered an order modifying Cousins’ judgment and sentence to reflect a withhold of adjudication so that she could obtain a certificate of eligibility and file a proper motion to seal or expunge her criminal record.
The State objected below, and argues here, that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to modify Cousins’ completed sentence. We agree. As a general matter, a trial court loses jurisdiction to modify or change a sentence 60 days after the sentence is imposed or becomes final. See State v. Nichols, 629 So.2d 970, 972 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); cf. Schlabach v. State, 37 So.3d 230 (Fla.2010); Davis v. State, 887 So.2d 1286 (Fla.2004). Certainly, a trial court lacks jurisdiction to modify a legal sentence several years after it has been completed by the defendant.
Although the trial court had the best of intentions in modifying Cousins’ criminal sentence, it acted without jurisdiction. Therefore, the State’s petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the order of the trial court modifying Cousins’ judgment and sentence is quashed.
PETITION GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED.
SAWAYA, TORPY and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Schlabach v. State, 37 So. 3d 230 (Fla. 2010)
- Davis v. State, 887 So. 2d 1286 (Fla. 2004)
- State v. Nichols, 629 So. 2d 970 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)