OZA B. JENKINS, APPELLANT,
v.
MOTOROLA, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 2011-06-08
No. 3D10-3271
Before SHEPHERD, SUAREZ, and CORTIÑAS, JJ.
62 So. 3d 1210 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2011) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Topics
Sanctions For Frivolous Filings Frivolous Litigation Sanctions Pro Se Litigant

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sanctions For Frivolous Filings cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court
SHEPHERD, J.

SHEPHERD, J.

In Jenkins v. Motorola, Inc., — So.3d -, 2011 WL 1485967 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011), this court ordered Oza B. Jenkins to show cause why she should not be precluded from filing further pro se appeals in this court, arising out of lower tribunal number 04-1420. Ms. Jenkins timely filed her response, and Motorola, Inc. its reply.

Upon consideration of Ms. Jenkins’ response, the reply of Motorola, Inc., and this court’s independent review of the many filings made by Ms. Jenkins in this court, Ms. Jenkins hereby is barred from filing further pro se proceedings in this court arising out of lower tribunal number 04-1420. See Sibley v. Sibley, 885 So.2d 980, 985 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). We direct the clerk of this court to reject any further filings on Ms. Jenkins’ behalf, arising out of lower tribunal number 04-1420, unless signed by a member of the Florida Bar.

So ordered.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Lomax v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, 100 So. 3d 168 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)
    …in this court, we grant Appellee’s motion under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.410. See also May v. Barthet, 934 So. 2d 1184 (Fla.2006) (prohibiting future pro se filings as sanctions for filing frivolous appeals); Jenkins v. Motorola, Inc., 62 So. 3d 1210 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Sibley v. Sibley, 885 So. 2d 980, 985-88 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). Appellant, Mattie Lomax, is hereby prohibited from filing further pro se proceedings in this court regarding foreclosure and/or eviction from property located at 123 an…
  • Lomax v. Officer Reynolds of the City of Miami Police Dep't & Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 119 So. 3d 562 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)
    …in this court, we grant Appellee’s motion under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.410. See also May v. Barthet, 934 So. 2d 1184 (Fla.2006) (prohibiting future pro se filings as sanctions for filing frivolous appeals); Jenkins v. Motorola, Inc., 62 So. 3d 1210 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Sibley v. Sibley, 885 So. 2d 980, 985-88 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). Appellant, Mattie Lomax, is hereby prohibited from filing further pro se proceedings in this court regarding foreclosure and/or eviction from property located at 123 an…
  • Aguirre v. In re The Est. OF Efrain Aguirre, 112 So. 3d 650 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)
    …s to those who have not abused the system.” Based upon the copious meritless filings in this court, Aguirre is barred from filing further pro se proceedings in this court arising out of lower tribunal number 09-2280. See Jenkins v. Motorola, Inc., 62 So. 3d 1210 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Sibley v. Sibley, 885 So. 2d at 985 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). We direct the clerk of this court to reject any further filings from Aguirre, arising out of lower tribunal number 09-2280, unless signed by a member of the Florida Bar. Any…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw