DAYNE HOOKER, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2011-06-08
No. 3D11-1048
Before WELLS, SHEPHERD, and EMAS, JJ.
63 So. 3d 864 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2011)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Manzano v. State, 27 So.3d 781 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw