CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC, APPELLANT,
v.
MARIA MUSACCHIA AND ANTHONY MUSACCHIA, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Attorney's fees incurred in Lemon Law arbitration are not recoverable 'damages' under section 681.112(1), Florida Statutes.
The Musacchias leased a vehicle that was found to be a 'lemon' by an arbitration board, which ordered a refund. After receiving the refund, they sued …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Chrysler Group, LLC (“Chrysler”)1 appeals the final judgment granting the Musacchias’ claim for attorney’s fees under section 681.112(1), Florida Statutes (2006). We reverse based upon our recent decision in General Motors v. Bowie, 58 So.3d 934 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).
By way of background, the Musacchias leased a new Jeep Commander in 2006. After experiencing numerous problems with the vehicle, they filed a request for arbitration with the Lemon Law New Motor Vehicle Arbitration Board, contending the vehicle was a “lemon” and requesting a refund. See § 681.104(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2006). The arbitration board determined that the vehicle was a “lemon” and ordered Chrysler to refund the Musacchias for the purchase price of the vehicle minus a rea*142sonable offset for use. No appeal was taken from the arbitration board’s order.
After Chrysler’s compliance with the arbitration order, the Musacchias filed a lawsuit under section 681.112(1) seeking to recover the attorney’s fees they incurred in the arbitration. The trial court entered a judgment awarding those fees. This appeal follows.
As in Bowie, the issue before us is whether the attorney’s fees incurred during the Lemon Law proceeding before the arbitration board constitute “damages” recoverable pursuant to section 681.112(1). We have recently held that “ ‘damages’ under section 681.112 do not include attorney’s fees incurred in pursuing the refund option through arbitration.” General Motors, 58 So.3d at 935.
In this case, the Musacchias filed a suit solely for the purpose of recovering attorney’s fees incurred in the arbitration. Accordingly, the judgment awarding attorney’s fees is reversed with directions to enter judgment for the appellant.
Reversed.
GROSS, C.J., and POLEN J., concur.