KEITH JACKSON, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Supreme Court held that the appellate court erred in its prior decision regarding the trial court's role in determining statutory immunity.
The Fourth District Court of Appeal relied on its own precedent in Jackson v. State, which was pending review by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Statutory Immunity cases and more on FLexlaw
We have for review Jackson v. State, No. 4D10-2100 (Fla. 4th DCA Jun. 15, 2010), in which the Fourth District Court of Appeal concluded that the trial court did not depart from the essential requirements of law. The Fourth District relied upon its prior decision Dennis v. State, 17 So.3d 305 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). At the time the Fourth District issued Jackson, Dennis was pending review in this Court. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla.1981).
We stayed proceedings in this case pending disposition of Dennis v. State, 51 So.3d 456 (Fla.2010), in which we determined that where a criminal defendant files a motion to dismiss on the basis of section 776.032, Florida Statutes (2006), the trial court should decide the factual question of the applicability of the statutory immunity. In so holding, we disapproved the Fourth District’s reasoning. We then issued an order directing the State to show cause why this Court should not exercise jurisdiction in the instant case, summarily quash the order on review, and remand for reconsideration in light of Dennis. The State has filed a response conceding that “given the procedural posture of this case ... this cause should be remanded for reconsideration.”
We accordingly grant the petition for review in the instant case. The order under review is quashed, and this matter is remanded to the Fourth District for reconsideration upon application of this Court’s decision in Dennis.
It is so ordered.
PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Jollie v. State, 405 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 1981)
- Dennis v. State, 51 So. 3d 456 (Fla. 2010)
- Furney v. State, 17 So. 3d 305 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)
- Dennis v. State, 17 So. 3d 305 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)