OSIRIS CHAVIANO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2011-06-22
No. 3D11-1322
Before SHEPHERD and EMAS, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
65 So. 3d 96 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2011) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Rothe v. State, 76 So. 3d 1010 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
    …of 605 nanograms per milliliter. We disagree and affirm because the State also presented evidence that Rothe admitted possessing cocaine. A court may not rely only on hearsay evidence to find a violation of community control. See Melton v. State, 65 So. 3d 96, 97 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Andrews v. State, 693 So. 2d 1138, 1141 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). But hearsay may be used in such proceedings to supplement or explain competent, non-hearsay evidence. See Carter v. State, — So. 3d—, 2011 WL 3558153 (Fla. 1st DCA…
  • Hallman v. State, 275 So. 3d 845 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw