FRANCIS CARROLL RUEDIGER, APPELLANT,
v.
IRIS GAY RUEDIGER, APPELLEE
FRANCIS CARROLL RUEDIGER, APPELLANT,
IRIS GAY RUEDIGER, APPELLEE
102 So. 2d 394
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1958)
Caution
Cited by 19 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to the rules of this court, and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made, and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument ;
It is accordingly Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is
Affirmed.
STURGIS, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD, K„ and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
N. Broward Hosp. Dist. v. Von D. Mizell, 148 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1962)…City of Lakeland, 158 Fla. 151, 28 So. 2d 106. For the rule of absolute discretion vested in private hospital control of medical staff see West Coast Hospital Ass’n v. Hoare, Fla.1953, 64 So. 2d 293. . Ibid. . Dade County v. Trombly, Fla.App.1958, 102 So. 2d 394; Green v. City of St. Petersburg, 154 Fla. 339, 17 So. 2d 517. . Bryant v. City of Lakeland, note 6 supra, 28 So. 2d at p. 107. The case of Barrow v. Holland, Fla.1960, 125 So. 2d 749, referred to in the decree below, involved a statute which neces…
-
Bergh v. Bergh, 127 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961)…rule in Harmon clearly applies to this case. It has been consistently followed in a plethora of decisions of our Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal. See Sconyer v. Scheper, Fla.App.1960, 119 So. 2d 408; Dade County v. Trombly, Fla.App.1958, 102 So. 2d 394; Donahue v. Davis, Fla.1953, 68 So. 2d 163, 172; Martin v. Martin, Fla.1953, 66 So. 2d 268; Carretta v. Carretta, Fla.1952, 58 So. 2d 439; Thompson v. Field, Fla.1951, 54 So. 2d 520, 521; Johnston v. Johnston, Fla.1950, 48 So. 2d 926; Rubenstein v.…
-
McANESPIE v. McANESPIE, 200 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967)…1911, 62 Fla. 460, 57 So. 243; Kent v. Knowles, 1931, [*608] 101 Fla. 1375, 133 So. 315; McAdow v. Smith, 1937, 127 Fla. 29, 172 So. 448; Florida Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Miami v. Brown, Fla.1950, 47 So. 2d 748; Dade County v. Trombly, Fla.App.1958, 102 So. 2d 394. A Master’s findings should not be disregarded “unless clearly wrong”. Parker v. Interstate Trust & Banking Co., CCA Fla.1932, 56 F. 2d 792; Spencer v. Young, Fla.1953, 63 So. 2d 334; Moncrief v. Hall, Fla.1953, 63 So. 2d 640; Slatcoff v. Dezen, Fla…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence