KEITH L. SIMMONS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Keith Simmons appealed the trial court's summary denial of his Rule 3.850 postconviction motion alleging ten grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. The appellate court affirmed denial of claims two through ten but reversed the summary denial of ground one, which alleged ineffective assistance in failing to obtain a ruling on a motion to sever, because the record was inadequate to conclusively determine the claim.
The court affirmed the summary denial of claims two through ten, but reversed the summary denial of ground one and remanded for further proceedings because the trial court failed to assemble an adequate record from which it could be conclusively determined that Simmons was entitled to no relief on the facially sufficient claim.
[1] A trial court must attach portions of the record that conclusively refute a facially sufficient claim of ineffective assistance of counsel when summarily denying a motion…
[2] Failure to obtain a ruling on a motion to sever may constitute ineffective assistance of counsel unless supported by reasonable trial strategy.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“without an adequate record, we are in no position to make such a fact-based determination”
Establishes the requirement that a record must be adequate to conclusively determine whether a postconviction claim warrants summary denial
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceSimmons filed a postconviction motion alleging ten grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. Ground one claimed his defense attorney rendered inef…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Record Attachments cases and more on FLexlaw
Appellant, Keith Simmons, appeals the trial court’s summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief alleging ten grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Summary denial was proper as to claims two through ten. Therefore, we affirm the denial of these claims without further discussion. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the summary denial of ground one, remand for further proceedings in connection with that ground, and affirm the trial court’s order in all other respects.
In ground one, Appellant alleged his defense attorney rendered ineffective assistance in failing to obtain a ruling on a motion to sever. The trial court based its denial of this claim on the State’s response to Appellant’s postconviction motion, which characterized defense counsel’s failure to obtain a ruling on the motion as trial strategy. In its response, the State neither referenced nor attached portions of the record refuting Appellant’s claims. Similarly, the trial court’s order failed to include record attachments. While the failure to obtain a ruling on a motion to sever based on reasonable trial strategy may refute a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, “without an adequate record, we are in no position to make such a fact-based determination.” See Davis v. State, 648 So.2d 1249, 1250 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (citing Williams v. State, 642 So.2d 67, 69 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)). Thus, because the trial court failed to assemble a record from which it could be conclusively determined that Appellant is entitled to no relief on this facially sufficient claim, we reverse the trial court’s order as to that claim and *328remand with instructions for the court to either attach portions of the record conclusively refuting this claim or for an eviden-tiary hearing. See Williams v. State, 46 So.3d 118, 119 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (identifying this form of relief).
In addition to challenging the summary denial of his ten postconviction claims, Appellant raises two issues for the first time on appeal. We decline to address these issues because, among other reasons, Appellant’s failure to present arguments associated with both issues renders them “insufficiently presented for review.” Shere v. State, 742 So.2d 215, 218 n. 6 (Fla.1999) (because the appellant “did not present any argument or allege on what grounds the trial court erred in denying these claims,” the claims were “insufficiently presented for review”); see also State v. Mitchell, 719 So.2d 1245, 1247 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (concluding that “[i]n the absence of any argument addressed to the [claim],” the appellant “abandoned such a claim”).
Accordingly, we affirm the denial of claims two through ten but reverse the denial of claim one and remand for further proceedings on this claim.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with instructions.
DAVIS, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gallion v. State, 154 So. 3d 1149 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)…4) (noting that a defendant is entitled to an evi-dentiary hearing on a postconviction relief claim unless the motion and record conclusively show that he or she is entitled to no relief or where the claim is legally insufficient); Simmons v. State, 66 So. 3d 327, 327-28 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (reversing for record attachments or for an evidentiary hearing where the trial court failed to assemble a record from which it could be conclusively determined that the appellant was not entitled to any relief on his fac…
Authorities Cited
- Shere v. State, 742 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 1999)
- Williams v. State, 642 So. 2d 67 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
- Davis v. State, 648 So. 2d 1249 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
- State v. General Lee Mitchell, 719 So. 2d 1245 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
- Royce M. Williams v. State, 46 So. 3d 118 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)