ROBERT LEE YOUNG, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2011-08-09
No. 1D10-6410
BENTON, C.J., HAWKES and CLARK, JJ., concur.
66 So. 3d 1076 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2011) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant is appealing an order in which the trial court struck the appellant’s postconviction claims as facially insufficient and, in accordance with Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754, 761 (Fla.2007), granted the appellant thirty days to amend. The order is a nonappealable, nonfinal order. See Lee v. State, 939 So.2d 154, 155 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

DISMISSED.

BENTON, C.J., HAWKES and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Bond v. State, 185 So. 3d 699 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)
    …PER CURIAM. Upon consideration of appellant’s response to the Court’s order of January 11, 2016, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is not a final, appealable order. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(2); Young v. State, 66 So. 3d 1076 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. The dismissal is without prejudice to seek appellate review upon rendition of a final order disposing of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief. LEWIS, BILBREY, and KELSEY, Jj, conc…
  • Corn v. State, 237 So. 3d 483 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)
    …PER CURIAM. Upon consideration of Appellant’s response to the Court’s order of December 18, 2017, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is not a final, appealable order. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(2); Young v. State, 66 So. 3d 1076 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. WETHERELL, ROWE, and JAY, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _________________…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw