RHODERICK LEWIS LEWIS, II, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Browne v. State, 132 So. 3d 312 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)
  …nts. “The standard of review for admissibility of evidence is abuse of discretion, limited by the rules of evidence. [W]hether evidence falls within the statutory definition of hearsay is a matter of law, subject to de novo review.” Lucas v. State, 67 So. 3d 332, 335 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (citations omitted). Thus, “whether evidence is admissible in evidence under an exception to the hearsay rule is a question of law ... [subject to] the de novo standard of review.” Powell v. State, 99 So. 3d 570, 573 (Fla. 1…
• Ivana Linic v. State, 80 So. 3d 382 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)
  …iscretion by sustaining the State’s relevancy objections to evidence of the defendant’s background as a Bosnian refugee. “The standard of review for admissibility of evidence is abuse of discretion, limited by the rules of evidence.” Lucas v. State, 67 So. 3d 332, 335 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (citation omitted). Whether evidence falls within the statutory definition of hearsay is a matter of law subject to de novo review. Id. Here, the trial court was correct to sustain the State’s objection to testimony by the d…
• Tolbert v. State, 114 So. 3d 291 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)
  …esults. “The standard of review for admissibility of evidence is abuse of discretion, limited by the rules of evidence. Whether evidence falls within the statutory definition of hearsay is a matter of law, subject to de novo review.” Lucas v. State, 67 So. 3d 332, 335 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (citations, alteration, and quotation marks omitted). “ ‘Hearsay1 is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.…