WILLIAM SHAUN JORDAN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2011-06-29
No. 3D11-751
Before RAMIREZ, C.J., and CORTINAS and SALTER, JJ.
67 So. 3d 1066 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2011) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Downs v. State, 616 So.2d 444, 446 (Fla.1993) (affirming the trial court’s stacking of mandatory minimum sentences for the murder of one victim and the aggravated assault with a firearm upon a witness to the murder).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Lebron v. State, 135 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. 2014)
    …d question was not prejudicial and is distinguishable from other cases that addressed the prejudicial impact of the erroneous introduction of Williams rule evidence. See, e.g., Jackson v. State, 451 So. 2d 458, 460-61 (Fla.1984); Schofield v. State, 67 So. 3d 1066, 1071-72 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011); Jackson v. State, 627 So. 2d 70, 71 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). We affirm the denial of this claim. Failure to Present Roswell Summers as a Witness During the 1998 Trial Lebrón contends that Danny Summers’ testimony during th…
  • Forbes v. State, 269 So. 3d 677 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)
  • Schofield v. State, 311 So. 3d 918 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020)

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw