EDWARD FIPPS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2011-08-23
No. 1D10-2421
WOLF, PADOVANO, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
68 So. 3d 365 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2011) Caution
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges his conviction and sentence for burglary of a dwelling. We find the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal. The State failed to provide sufficient evidence identifying appellant as the second perpetrator of the burglary. Therefore, we reverse and remand with instructions that appellant be discharged.

REVERSED AND REMANDED, with instructions.

WOLF, PADOVANO, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Pierre v. State, 77 So. 3d 699 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)
    …fused to give her the key. The appellant had taken all of his belongings, except a couple of stray clothing items. In addition, the victim asked the landlord to take the appellant off the lease and paid the rent herself. Finally, in Breen v. State, 68 So. 3d 365, 365 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011), the First District Court of Appeal held the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal, finding no abandonment, where “evidence established appellant entered the apartment he shared with his g…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw