PATRICK DAY, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
PATRICK DAY, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
69 So. 3d 306
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2011)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
DENIED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(d)(5).
BENTON, C.J., ROBERTS and RAY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
City OF Miami Beach v. Kuoni Destination Mgmt., Inc., 81 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)…e injury to be moot as the birthday party in question took place as planned. Although we recognize that an appellate court has jurisdiction to address moot questions that are likely to recur,2 see Paul Jacquin & Sons, Inc. v. City of Port St. Lucie, 69 So. 3d 306 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011), we decline to address the determination made below on the sufficiency of facts supporting the granting of the temporary injunction. Because the purpose of a temporary injunction is not to resolve disputed issues, but rather to…
-
O'Boyle v. Town OF Gulf Stream, 257 So. 3d 1036 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)
-
Marcus v. State, 201 So. 3d 851 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)…es of prospective jurors during von- dire. However, the trial court heard arguments on this issue at the evidentiary hearing. Therefore, the issue is moot as the requested relief was granted. See Paul Jacquin & Sons, Inc., v. City of Port St. Lucie, 69 So. 3d 306, 308 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). On remand, the trial court should include the above claim in its analysis. Based on the foregoing, we REVERSE the trial court’s final order and REMAND for the trial court to make findings of fact and draw conclusions of la…