MICHAEL ALLEN CRANE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Michael Allen Crane appealed the trial court's summary denial of his motion to withdraw no contest pleas. The appellate court reversed, holding that the trial court committed reversible error by denying the motion without holding an evidentiary hearing to develop facts surrounding the plea's entry.
The trial court committed reversible error by denying the motion to withdraw pleas without first holding an evidentiary hearing. When a motion presents a sufficient basis for withdrawal of a plea based on attorney's mistaken advice or failure to advise, an evidentiary hearing is required to develop the facts surrounding the plea's entry.
[1] A trial court must hold an evidentiary hearing on a motion to withdraw a guilty or no contest plea when the motion presents a sufficient basis for withdrawal.
[2] Good cause for withdrawing a plea exists when the plea was involuntary, infected by misapprehension, undue persuasion, or ignorance, or when the ends of justice would be…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“where a motion presents a sufficient basis for withdrawal of a plea, a trial court commits reversible error if it fails to 'conduct an evidentiary hearing in order to develop the facts surrounding the entry of the plea.'”
Establishes the core holding that summary denial of a plea withdrawal motion without an evidentiary hearing is reversible error
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceCrane was charged in three separate cases with various offenses including fraud, stolen property dealing, drug possession, and theft. He pleaded no co…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Good Cause For Plea Withdrawal cases and more on FLexlaw
Michael Allen Crane pleaded no contest to various charges in three separate cases. Before he was sentenced, Crane filed a motion to withdraw his pleas. The motion was summarily denied, and Crane now appeals that denial. Because the trial court erred in denying the motion without first holding an evidentiary hearing, we reverse.
Crane was charged in case number 09-CF-1215 with obtaining money from a pawn shop by fraud and dealing in stolen property. He was charged in case number 09-CF-2240 with possession of a controlled substance, petit theft, and resisting arrest in retail theft. In case number 09-CF-3326, Crane was charged with dealing in stolen property, obtaining money from a pawn shop by fraud, burglary, and grand theft. Crane pleaded no contest to all of the charges except burglary and grand theft. The trial court scheduled the remaining charges for trial and set a sentencing date for the charges to which Crane pleaded. Sentencing was to occur before Crane’s trial. Prior to sentencing, Crane filed a motion to withdraw his plea pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(f).
The motion alleged that Crane’s plea was involuntary and that he entered his pleas with the understanding that sentencing would be reserved until after the trial on the burglary and grand theft charges. At a nonevidentiary hearing on the motion, Crane’s attorney argued that she failed to advise Crane of an available defense. Counsel repeatedly stated that she failed to recognize and advise Crane that his lack of knowledge that the items pawned were stolen was a defense to the dealing in stolen property charges. The trial court ultimately denied Crane’s mo*359tion but rescheduled Crane’s sentencing to occur after his trial.
Rule 3.170(f) provides that “[t]he court may in its discretion, and shall on good cause,” permit a no contest or guilty plea to be withdrawn at any time prior to sentencing. Good cause “has been found to exist when the defendant’s plea was ‘infected by misapprehension, undue persuasion, ignorance, or was entered by one not competent to know its consequence or that it was otherwise involuntary, or that the ends of justice would be served by withdrawal of such plea.’ ” Lehmkuhle v. State, 20 So.3d 971, 973 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (quoting Onnestad v. State, 404 So.2d 403, 405 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)),
By arguing that she had failed to advise her client, counsel “was attempting to demonstrate good cause to withdraw the plea.” Id. (citing Trenary v. State, 453 So.2d 1132, 1133-34 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)). “[A] defendant’s entry of a plea based upon his attorney’s mistaken advice can be a valid basis for finding good cause.” Johnson v. State, 971 So.2d 212, 215 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). Moreover, where a motion presents a sufficient basis for withdrawal of a plea, a trial court commits reversible error if it fails to “conduct an evidentiary hearing in order to develop the facts surrounding the entry of the plea.” Caddo v. State, 806 So.2d 520, 521 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (citing Sanders v. State, 662 So.2d 1372, 1374 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)).
Accordingly, we vacate Crane’s sentences on the charges to which he pleaded, see Whitaker v. State, 881 So.2d 80, 82 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), and remand this case for the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing on the motion to withdraw pleas.
KHOUZAM and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Karri Hughen v. State, 96 So. 3d 1114 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)…03)). And “where a motion presents a sufficient basis for withdrawal of a plea, a trial court commits reversible error if it fails to ‘conduct an evidentiary hearing in order to develop the facts surrounding the entry of the plea.’ ” Crane v. State, 69 So. 3d 357, 359 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (quoting Caddo v. State, 806 So. 2d 520, 521 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)). Here, Hughen asserted at the sentencing hearing that she was misad-vised by her prior counsel at the time she entered her plea. Because “[a] defendant’s entry…
-
Paige M. Rivera v. State, 136 So. 3d 609 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)…03)). And “where a motion presents a sufficient basis for withdrawal of a plea, a trial court commits reversible error if it fails to ‘conduct an evidentiary hearing in order to develop the facts surrounding the entry of the plea.’ ” Crane v. State, 69 So. 3d 357, 359 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (quoting Caddo v. State, 806 So. 2d 520, 521 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)). Hughen v. State, 96 So. 3d 1114, 1115 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); see also Molina v. State, 942 So. 2d 1036, 1037 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (stating that “if a misunderstand…
-
Hypes v. State, 163 So. 3d 745 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)…ause, at any time before a sentence, permit a plea of guilty or no contest to be withdrawn.” If the defendant establishes good cause, the court must allow the defendant to withdraw the plea. Tanzi v. State, 964 So. 2d 106 (Fla.2007); Crane v. State, 69 So. 3d 357 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011); and Murray v. State, 36 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). Once good cause is éstab-lished, the court no longer has discretion to consider the request to withdraw. A showing of good cause “entitles the defendant to withdraw a plea a…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Onnestad v. State, 404 So. 2d 403 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)
- Basso v. Lugo, 453 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
- Caddo v. State, 806 So. 2d 520 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
- Johnson v. State, 971 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
- Lehmkuhle v. State, 20 So. 3d 971 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
- Sanders v. State, 662 So. 2d 1372 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
- Whitaker v. State, 881 So. 2d 80 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)