OPTIMUM NUTRITION, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
PERFORMANCE TRADING IMP. EXP & COM. LTD., APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Optimum Nutrition appeals the trial court's dismissal of its complaint for failure to prosecute under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e). The court reverses, holding that when a notice of lack of prosecution is served by mail, five additional days must be added to the sixty-day safe-harbor period, and Optimum timely filed a motion for summary judgment within that extended deadline.
The court held that the sixty-day period for conducting record activity under Rule 1.420(e) is extended by five additional days when the notice of lack of prosecution is served by mail, making the deadline October 4, 2010. Because Optimum filed its motion for summary judgment on September 28, 2010, it timely conducted record activity within the safe-harbor period, and dismissal was therefore improper.
[1] A party has sixty days to conduct record activity after service of a notice of lack of prosecution to avoid dismissal under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e).
[2] When computing time periods under the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, the day of the act, event, or default from which the period begins to run is not included.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“In computing any period of time prescribed or allowed by these rules, by order of court, or by any applicable statute, the day of the act, event, or default from which the designated period of time begins to run shall not be included. The last day of the period so computed shall be included unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, in which event the period shall run until the end of the next day which is neither a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday.”
Establishes the foundational rule for computing time periods under Florida Rules of Civil Procedure
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe trial court issued a notice of lack of prosecution on July 29, 2010, served by mail upon Optimum. On September 28, 2010, Optimum filed and served …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Record Activity cases and more on FLexlaw
Optimum Nutrition, Inc. (“Optimum”), appeals the trial court’s dismissal of its complaint for failure to prosecute under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e). We reverse.
On July 29, 2010, the trial court issued a notice of lack of prosecution. On September 28, 2010, Optimum filed and served a motion for summary judgment. Optimum claims on appeal that the sixty-day period provided under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 1.420(e), which allows for conducting record activity after service of the notice of lack of prosecution, expired on October 4, 2010; therefore, dismissal for lack of prosecution was improper. Performance Trading contends that the sixty-day period expired on September 27, 2010.
Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e)1 provides that a party has sixty *1059days to conduct record activity after service of the notice of lack of prosecution in order to avoid dismissal under the rule. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.090 provides for the computation of time in settling a dispute under the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure:
(a) Computation. In computing any period of time prescribed or allowed by these rules, by order of court, or by any applicable statute, the day of the act, event, or default from which the designated period of time begins to run shall not be included. The last day of the period so computed shall be included unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, in which event the period shall run until the end of the next day which is neither a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday.
Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.090(e) provides additional time when service is made by mail:
Additional Time After Service by Mail. When a party has the right or is required to do some act or take some proceeding within a prescribed period after the service of a notice or other paper upon that party and the notice or paper is served upon that party by mail, 5 days shall be added to the prescribed period.
The time period for an act to be computed after service of a notice, pleading, motion, order or paper served by mail includes five days which are added to the time. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.090; see Palmer v. Palmer, 582 So.2d 639, 640 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). Because the notice of lack of prosecution was served by mail upon Optimum, an additional five days must be added to the safe-harbor period, meaning the period for conducting record activity did not actually expire until Monday, October 4, 2010. As Optimum filed and served its motion for summary judgment on September 28, 2010, it effectively “conducted record activity” within the meaning of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e), as the expiration of the time period for service did not expire until five days after September 28, 2010. Therefore, the dismissal of the compliant for failure to prosecute under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e) was error.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.