LARRY T. SCOTT, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Postconviction Motion cases and more on FLexlaw
Larry T. Scott petitions this court for a writ of mandamus, complaining that the circuit court’s order on his postconviction motion failed to address ground one, sub-claim five and ground eight, subclaim four raised in the motion. The circuit court, however, has entered a final order denying postconviction relief which expressly addresses many of petitioner’s claims. The order is a final order. All claims, whether expressly addressed by the circuit court or not, were denied. It is not necessary for the lower tribunal to address every claim or subclaim with particularity in its final order. See, e.g., Bailem v. State, 984 So.2d 604 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008); see also Holley v. State, 859 So.2d 568 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
PETITION DENIED.
THOMAS, ROBERTS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
T.N.L. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 132 So. 3d 319 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)…dings); S.V.-R., 77 So. 3d at 690-91 (reversing orders denying mother’s motion for reunification and directing that child remain with father, and remanding for trial court to make required “endangerment” finding under section 39.522(2)); In re G.M., 73 So. 3d 320, 322 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (“Without finding that reunification would be detrimental to the child, it is reversible error to permanently award custody to a nonoffending parent when the offending parent has a case plan goal of reunification and has subs…
Authorities Cited
- Tremaine Bailem v. State, 984 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)
- Holley v. State, 859 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)