MANUEL J. CRIOLLO, APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2011-10-31
No. 1D11-2182
DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK, and ROWE, JJ., concur.
73 So. 3d 339 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2011)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellee’s confession of error, the final order is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to enter a new order which either accepts the penalty recommendation of the Administrative Law Judge or reimposes the increased penalty stating with particularity the reasons for increasing the penalty as required by section 120.57(1)(l), Florida Statutes (2010). See Shah v. Dep’t of Health, 804 So.2d 615 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK, and ROWE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw