COLETTE GRAY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2011-11-08
No. 5D11-2949
PALMER, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
73 So. 3d 873 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2011) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Shaikh, 65 So.3d 539 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011).

PALMER, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …1213 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (citation omitted). In order to be entitled to summary judgment, a mortgagee must refute all of the affirmative defenses of the mortgagor or show that they are legally insufficient. Woodrum v. Wells Fargo Mortg. Bank, N.A., 73 So. 3d 873, 874 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (citing Frost v. Regions Bank, 15 So. 3d 905 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)). Because the bank failed to show that it provided appellant with the requisite notice and opportunity to cure, it was not entitled to a final summary judgment…
  • …an answer being served where no default has been entered. In such circumstance, the plaintiff must go a step further, and conclusively demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact. See, e.g., Woodrum v. Wells Fargo Mortg. Bank, N.A., 73 So. 3d 873 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); Dominico v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A., 102 So. 3d 696 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). Such law is well stated in Dominico where we reversed a summary judgment because the plaintiff failed to establish that “no answer which the defendant might…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw