FREEMAN A. WILKEY, APPELLANT,
v.
CHARLES ALBERT LOUDON AND DOROTHY LOUDON, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1958-05-15
No. 57-465
CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.
102 So. 2d 832 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1958) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal in this case was taken from an order denying the motion for new trial instead of from the final judgment entered in the case. Douglas-Guardian Warehouse Corp. v. Insurance Agents Finance Corp., Fla.1950, 46 So.2d 169; Warren v. Rhea, Fla.1953, 64 So.2d 567; Beck v. Hotchkiss, Fla.1954, 75 So.2d 289; Denton v. Cummins Diesel Engines of Florida, Fla.App. 1958, 101 So.2d 617.

Appeal dismissed ex mero motu.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Mickler v. W. H. Smith and his wife, 111 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959)
    …t only from the order denying the motion for new trial. The appeal is dismissed ex mero motu. Beck v. Hotchkiss, Fla.1954, 75 So. 2d 289; Denton v. Cummins Diesel Engines of Florida, Fla.App. 1958, 101 So. 2d 617; and Wilkey v. Loudon, Fla.App.1958, 102 So. 2d 832. Dismissed. KANNER, C. J., and ALLEN and SHANNON, JJ., concur.…
  • Whigam v. Ormand Arthur Bornstein, 118 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960)
    …tat. § 59.05, F.S.A.) but no provision has been made for an appeal from an order denying motion for new trial or other post trial motions. See Denton v. Cummins Diesel Engines of Florida, Fla.App.1958, 101 So. 2d 617; Wilkey v. Loudon, Fla.App.1958, 102 So. 2d 832; Mickler v. Smith, Fla.App.1958, 111 So. 2d 457. In view of the status of this appeal as reflected by the record, we have no alternative than to dismiss this appeal. It is so ordered. HORTON, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw