ANTHONY DIXON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ANTHONY DIXON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
76 So. 3d 358
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2011)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED. See Rowland v. State, 680 So.2d 502, 503 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (rejecting Rowland’s argument that his right to present a defense was unduly hampered when the trial court excluded evidence of an instance of sexual activity *359on the part of the child witness with another child, stating: “We do not disturb the trial judge’s ruling that the evidence was irrelevant.”).
BENTON, C.J., ROWE, and RAY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sutton v. State, 90 So. 3d 885 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)…even. Because there is no actual error with Sutton’s conviction, either statutorily or as to the offenses committed, Sutton was properly sentenced, and we find no basis on which to reverse or remand the judgment for correction. Cf. Harrell v. State, 76 So. 3d 358 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (remanding for the trial court to enter a written judgment correctly reflecting Harrell’s convictions); Mann v. State, 62 So. 3d 1240 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (remanding to correct a written judgment erroneously indicating that Mann was…
Authorities Cited
- Rowland v. State, 680 So. 2d 502 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)