THOMAS F. COLLINS, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
MONROE COUNTY, ET AL., APPELLEES
THOMAS F. COLLINS, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
MONROE COUNTY, ET AL., APPELLEES
76 So. 3d 370
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2011)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. Cnty. of L.A., 210 Cal.App.3d 1353, 258 Cal.Rptr. 893, 907 (Cal.Ct.App.1989).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Collins v. Monroe Cnty., 118 So. 3d 872 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)…mits could be made available to them despite the BUDs and BOCC resolutions.7 Based upon the foregoing, we affirm the trial court’s Final Judgment. Affirmed. . See Riordan v. Monroe Cnty., 99 So. 3d 961 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Collins v. Monroe Cnty., 76 So. 3d 370 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Collins v. Monroe Cnty., 999 So. 2d 709, 714 n. 9 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008); and State v. Collins, 940 So. 2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). . The named appellants are Thomas F. Collins and Patricia Collins, Donald Davis, Aurelia Del Valle an…1 / 2
-
Stroud v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)