IN RE AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.800(C)
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Court adopts amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) to clarify time limits for sua sponte sentence modification and ruling on defendant's motions.
[1] A trial court retains jurisdiction to modify a sentence if a defendant files a motion within the prescribed time period and the court rules on the motion within a reasona…
[2] A trial court has sixty days from the imposition of a sentence or from the receipt of an appellate court's mandate to sua sponte modify a sentence or rule on a defendant'…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe Criminal Procedure Rules Committee proposed amendments to rule 3.800(c) in response to a prior decision regarding trial court jurisdiction over se…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Modification Of Sentence cases and more on FLexlaw
This matter is before the Court for consideration of proposed amendments to *914Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) (Correction, Reduction, and Modification of Sentences: Reduction and Modification). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.; Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.140(f).
At the request of the Court, the Criminal Procedure Rules Committee (Committee) has filed an out-of-cycle report proposing amendments to rule 3.800(c). The Florida Bar Board of Governors’ Executive Committee unanimously approved the proposed amendments. We published the proposed amendments for comment. No comments were received.
The Committee’s proposals are in response to the Court’s request that amendments to rule 3.800(c) be proposed in light of our decision in Schlabach v. State, 37 So.3d 230 (Fla.2010). In that case, we determined whether a trial court loses jurisdiction to modify a sentence when a motion is filed within the sixty-day period provided in rule 3.800(c), but the trial court does not rule on the motion within that period. Id. at 230. We held that a trial court does not lose jurisdiction to modify a sentence imposed by it, if a defendant files a motion to modify the sentence within the sixty-day time period prescribed by rule 3.800(c) and the trial court rules on the motion within a reasonable time. Id. at 239. In doing so, we recognized that our holding did not quantify what constitutes a reasonable time and that there has been disagreement within the courts on whether a defendant may file a rule 3.800(c) motion up until the final day of the sixty-day time period. Id. n. 8. Accordingly, we directed the Committee to propose amendments to rule 3.800(c) that provide for a reasonable period of time for a defendant to file a rule 3.800(c) motion and an appropriate period of time for the trial court to rule upon such motions or to sua sponte reduce or modify a sentence. Id. n. 9.
Having considered the Committee’s report, we adopt the amendments to rule 3.800(c) proposed by the Committee, with modifications. The amended rule provides a sixty-day period of time for the trial court to sua sponte modify a sentence or for the defendant to file a motion to modify a sentence. The rule is further amended to provide that a trial court shall have ninety days, or such time as agreed by the parties or extended by the trial court, from the date a motion to modify a sentence is filed to enter an order ruling on the motion. Finally, language is added to provide that a motion to modify a sentence is deemed denied if an order is not timely entered by a trial court.
Accordingly, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 is hereby amended as set forth in the appendix to this opinion. New language is underscored. The amendment shall become effective immediately upon the release of this opinion.
It is so ordered.
PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
CANADY, C.J., dissents.
Appendix
RULE 3.800. CORRECTION, REDUCTION, AND MODIFICATION OF SENTENCES
(a) (b)[No Change]
(c)Reduction and Modification. A court may reduce or modify to include any of the provisions of chapter 948, Florida Statutes, a legal sentence imposed by it, sua sponte, or upon motion filed, within 60 days after the imposition, or within 60 days after receipt by the court of a man-
*915date issued by the appellate court on affir-mance of the judgment and/or sentence on an original appeal, or within 60 days after receipt by the court of a certified copy of an order of the appellate court dismissing an original appeal from the judgment and/or sentence, or, if further appellate review is sought in a higher court or in successively higher courts, within 60 days after the highest state or federal court to which a timely appeal has been taken under authority of law, or in which a petition for certiorari has been timely filed under authority of law, has entered an order of affirmance or an order dismissing the appeal and/or denying certiorari. If review is upon motion, the trial court shall have 90 days from the date the motion is filed or such time as agreed by the parties or as extended by the trial court to enter an order ruling on the motion. If no order is entered on the motion within 90 days or such time as extended by the parties or the trial court, the motion shall be deemed denied. This subdivision shall not be applicable to those cases in which the death sentence is imposed or those cases in which the trial judge has imposed the minimum mandatory sentence or has no sentencing discretion.
Committee Notes
[No Change]
Court Commentary
[No Change]
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, 132 So. 3d 734 (Fla. 2013)…ttee also proposed an amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). However, subsequent to the filing of the joint petition, this amendment was adopted in another case. See In re Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(C), 76 So. 3d 913, 914-15 (Fla.2011). Consequently, the proposal was withdrawn. . While we decline to delete the text of rule 3.800(a), which, as amended by this opinion allows a court "at any time” to correct an illegal sentence or an incorrect scoresheet calculati…
-
In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, 112 So. 3d 1234 (Fla. 2013)…ttee also proposed an amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). However, subsequent to the filing of the joint petition, this amendment was adopted in another case. See In re Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(C), 76 So. 3d 913, 914-15 (Fla.2011). Consequently, the proposal was withdrawn. . While we decline to delete the text of rule 3.800(a), which allows a court “at any time” to correct an illegal sentence, an incorrect scoresheet calculation, or a sentence that does no…
-
Mack v. State, 78 So. 3d 56 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)…rsuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). We treat the appeal as a petition for certiorari and grant relief based on Schlabach v. State, 37 So. 3d 230 (Fla.2010). See also In re Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), 76 So. 3d 913 (Fla.2011). Consequently, we quash the order and remand the matter for the trial court to consider the merits of Mack’s motion. Petition Granted; Order Quashed; Remanded. WARNER, STEVENSON and LEVINE, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Schlabach v. State, 37 So. 3d 230 (Fla. 2010)