GUICHARD JEAN-BAPTISTE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2011-12-21
No. 4D09-4958
STEVENSON and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
76 So. 3d 1070 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2011) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A mandatory life sentence without parole for a juvenile offender convicted of a non-homicide crime constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.


Facts & Procedural History

The defendant, sixteen at the time of the offense, was convicted of sexual battery and sentenced to life imprisonment. The United States Supreme Court…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
MAY, C.J.

MAY, C.J.

The defendant appeals his conviction for sexual battery on a person under twelve by a person under the age of eighteen, and his life sentence. We find no merit in the issues raised concerning his conviction, but reverse his life sentence. We remand the case to the trial court for resentencing.

Recently, the United States Supreme Court held that a life sentence without the possibility of parole for a non-homicide crime constitutes cruel and unusual punishment for a defendant under the age of eighteen at the time the crime is committed. Graham v. Florida, — U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 2033-34, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010). “A State need not guarantee the offender eventual release, but if it imposes a sentence of life it must provide him or her with some realistic opportunity to obtain release before the end of that term.” Id. at 2034.

Here, the defendant was sixteen at the time of the crime. His life sentence violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution and must be reversed. See Cunningham v. State, 74 So.3d 568 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

The conviction is affirmed, but the life sentence is reversed and the case is remanded for resentencing.

STEVENSON and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Guichard Jean-Baptiste v. State, 155 So. 3d 1237 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)
    …raham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), which prohibits life sentences for juveniles on convictions for crimes not involving murder as violative of the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Jean-Baptiste v. State, 76 So. 3d 1070 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).1 On remand, a full sentencing hearing was held. The defense sought a downward departure from the Criminal Punishment Code (“CPC”) Scoresheet recommended floor sentence based on three statutory factors: a) the defendant’s capaci…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw