RANDALL WHITFIELD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RANDALL WHITFIELD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
76 So. 3d 1080
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2011)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED. See Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).
ORFINGER, C.J., GRIFFIN and MONACO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Figueroa v. State, 84 So. 3d 1158 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)…t may not be convicted of a crime that has not been charged by the state.”); Price v. State, 995 So. 2d 401, 404 (Fla.2008) (reiterating that the failure to allege an essential element of a crime may be raised in a habeas petition); Harris v. State, 76 So. 3d 1080, 1081 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (stating that it is a denial of due process to convict a defendant of an uncharged crime); Pena v. State, 829 So. 2d 289, 292 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (“[T]he failure to allege an essential element of an offense in the chargi…
-
Ortiz v. State, 192 So. 3d 517 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)
-
Facundo v. State (Fla. 2d DCA 2025)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Flagg v. State, 74 So. 3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
- Holmes v. State, 74 So. 3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)