STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
LARRY DETOMBEUR, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2012-01-11
No. 4D11-776
MAY, C.J., HAZOURI and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
76 So. 3d 1139 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2012) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Knipp v. State, 67 So.3d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

MAY, C.J., HAZOURI and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • C.C. v. State, 127 So. 3d 685 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)
    …in a Rule 8.135(b)(2) motion pending appeal. Unfortunately, the trial court did not rule on the motion within, thirty days, as required in the rule, and the motion is deemed denied. Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.135(b)(1)(B), (2)(B); see, e.g., C.J.T. v. State, 76 So. 3d 1139, 1139 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). The court’s subsequent ruling is a nullity, because the court lacked jurisdiction. O.H. v. State, 948 So. 2d 79, 80 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). . This too was corrected by the trial court, but its order was untimely pursuant to R…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw