ROBERT JOHN DOYLE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2012-01-04
No. 3D11-2861
Before SHEPHERD, SUAREZ, and SALTER, JJ.
77 So. 3d 817 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2012)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant’s motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 was denied by the trial court. Because the motion challenges the defendant’s conviction rather than his sentence, we treat his motion as a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See, e.g., Rivas v. State, 43 So.3d 154, 156 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); Hilbert v. State, 661 So.2d 895, 895-96 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). The motion was untimely on its face and thus properly denied.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw