MARIO GARIBAY CRUZ, PETITIONER,
v.
SUSAN SLOAN CRUZ, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A petitioner in a family law matter sought a writ of prohibition to disqualify the trial judge after the judge sent a letter that would cause a reasonable person to fear not receiving a fair and impartial trial. The appellate court granted the petition, finding the disqualification motion timely filed and legally sufficient, and requiring the judge's recusal.
The motion to disqualify was timely because the filing deadline was extended to the next business day following Veteran's Day under Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.090(a), making Monday, November 14 the final deadline. The motion was also legally sufficient because the judge's letter was such that a reasonably prudent person would fear not receiving a fair and impartial trial, warranting disqualification.
[1] A motion to disqualify a judge is timely if filed within ten days of discovering the grounds for disqualification, with the period extended to the next business day if th…
[2] A reasonable person's fear of not receiving a fair and impartial trial constitutes grounds for disqualifying a judge.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the substance of the letter was such that a reasonably prudent person would be placed in fear of not receiving a fair and impartial trial”
Establishes the standard for disqualification and the court's finding that this standard was met
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe trial judge sent a letter dated November 1, 2011, to counsel for the petitioner. The substance of the letter was such that a reasonably prudent pe…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Reasonable Time For Filing cases and more on FLexlaw
Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition preventing the lower court judge from further presiding over the proceedings in St. Johns County case number DR08-1906. Because the lower court judge improperly denied Petitioner’s motion to disqualify as untimely, and because the motion to disqualify was otherwise legally sufficient, we grant the petition.
The genesis of the disqualification issue arose pursuant to correspondence, dated November 1, 2011, that was sent by the lower court judge to counsel for Petitioner. Suffice it to say that the substance of the letter was such that a reasonably prudent person would be placed in fear of not receiving a fair and impartial trial. See, e.g., Ennis v. Ennis, 855 So.2d 229 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).
On Monday, November 14, 2011, Petitioner filed his verified motion to disqualify the lower court judge, citing to the state*881ments made by the judge in the November 1, 2011, letter. Although rule 2.330(e), Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, requires a motion to disqualify to “be filed within a reasonable time not to exceed 10 days after discovery of the facts constituting the grounds for the motion ...,” in the instant case, the tenth day fell on Friday, November 11, 2011, which was Veteran’s Day. Accordingly, Petitioner was entitled to file his motion on the “next day which is neither a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday.” Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.090(a). See Holter v. Dohnansky, 917 So.2d 242, 243 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (“[Bjecause the last day of the period fell on a Sunday, the ten-day filing period actually ran to the end of the next day that was not a Saturday, Sunday or holiday.”). Petitioner’s November 14, 2011, motion to disqualify was, therefore, timely.
We conclude that under the circumstances presented in the instant case, Petitioner may have reasonably feared that he would not receive a fair and impartial trial. The lower court judge must, therefore, be disqualified from presiding further in this ease.1
PETITION GRANTED.
ORFINGER, C.J., SAWAYA, AND EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Ennis v. Ennis, 855 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
- Holter v. Dohnansky, 917 So. 2d 242 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)