TRAVIOUS DEMAR NORRIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2012-01-31
No. 1D10-5851
VAN NORTWICK, THOMAS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.
77 So. 3d 1278 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2012) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

VAN NORTWICK, THOMAS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Curtis v. Tower Hill Prime Ins. Co., 154 So. 3d 1193 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)
    …2d 20, 24-25 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (discussing circumstances when premature suits should be either abated or dismissed without prejudice). The circuit court erred in granting this motion for summary judgment. See Panjikaran v. State Farm Fla. Ins. Co., 77 So. 3d 1278, 1280 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (reversing summary judgment when it was “unclear whether the parties dispute the amount of loss or a denial of coverage”). Tower Hill’s other successful summary judgment motion contended that, by filing suit just after the…
  • Travelers Commercial Ins. Co. v. Harrington, 86 So. 3d 1274 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)
    …coverage and stacking issues are affirmed, the award is therefore reversed because summary judgment on the amount of benefits is inappropriate where there are outstanding factual issues still in dispute. See, e.g., Panjikaran v. State Farm Ins. Co., 77 So. 3d 1278 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); Schwartz v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 73 So. 3d 798 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). The reversal of the benefits award necessitates reversal of the accompanying attorney’s fee award for Ms. Harrington because the fee award was base…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw