M.K., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2012-02-01
No. 3D11-1573
Before SHEPHERD, SUAREZ, and SALTER, JJ.
79 So. 3d 154 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2012) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Little v. State, 77 So.3d 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Martinez v. Martinez, 228 So. 3d 164 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)
    …llows the Husband to do so. Because the award does not provide for the Wife’s needs as they were established during the marriage despite the Husband’s apparent ability to meet those needs, it constituted an abuse of discretion. See Melton v. Melton, 79 So. 3d 154, 156-57 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). We therefore reverse and remand for the court to reconsider the alimony award. On remand, the court may take additional evidence to establish the parties’ current financial circumstances. See Levy v. Levy, 900 So. 2d 737…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw