TIMOTHY LEE, JR., PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2012-02-09
No. 1D12-0097
VAN NORTWICK, JR., THOMAS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.
79 So. 3d 194 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2012) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied as premature.

VAN NORTWICK, JR., THOMAS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Taylor v. Taylor, 183 So. 3d 1121 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015)
    …nce creates a need for interpretation or reveals an insufficiency in the contract or a failure to specify the rights or duties of the parties in certain situations. See Whiting v. Whiting, 160 So. 3d 921, 924 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015); McClune v. McClune, 79 So. 3d 194, 197 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012); GE Fanuc Intelligent Platforms [*1123] Embedded v. Brijot Imaging Sys., Inc., 51 So. 3d 1243, 1245 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). “When a contract contains a latent .ambiguity, the trial court ‘must hear parol evidence to interpret t…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw