SHANDS MEDICAL CENTER, INC., PETITIONER,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Landmark AT Crescent Ridge LP v. Everest Fin., Inc., 219 So. 3d 218 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)
  …CRESCENT RIDGE REIT, LP, a Delaware limited partnership; ELCO LR CRESCENT RIDGE REIT GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and LANDMARK AT CRESCENT RIDGE GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. . For instance in Tetrault v. Calkins, 79 So. 3d 213 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012), irreparable harm was found when a trial court denied a motion to dissolve a lis pendens placed by plaintiff who did not claim and was not seeking an ownership interest in the subject property. The lis pendens in Tetrault interfer…
• J.B.J. Inv. OF S. Fla., Inc. v. Maslanka, 163 So. 3d 726 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015)
  …rari relief from an erroneous interlocutory order, a petitioner must demonstrate that the order departs from, the essential requirements of law and causes irreparable harm that cannot be corrected on post-judgment appeal. [*728] Tetrault v. Calkins, 79 So. 3d 213, 215 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). The term “lis pendens” is defined as the jurisdiction, power, or control that courts acquire over property involved in a pending suit. Med. Facilities Dev., Inc. v. Little Arch Creek Props., Inc., 675 So. 2d 915, 917 (Fla.1…
• RED Beryl, Inc. v. Sarasota Vault Depository, Inc., 176 So. 3d 375 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)
  …as not made this showing. For purposes of this proceeding, we accept that Red Beryl, if it actually has a right of possession to these gems at this time, could suffer irreparable injury by having the gems held by the court. Cf. Tetrault v. Calkins, 79 So. 3d 213, 215 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (explaining that an order denying a motion to discharge a lis pen-dens may cause harm not remediable on appeal because a lis pendens operates as a cloud on title that may constrain a petitioner’s right to convey property). N…