ISMAIL A.H. AKBAR, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2011-05-02
No. 1D11-0428
DAVIS, LEWIS and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.
79 So. 3d 747 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2011) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s order summai'ily denying his rule 3.800(a) motion. We affirm.

This is at least the ninth postconviction motion filed by Appellant concerning his 1989 conviction. The exact same claim raised in the current motion has been denied multiple times by the trial court, and this court affirmed the denial of this claim on the merits in Akbar v. State, 808 So.2d 215 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (table). Accordingly, we find this appeal to be frivolous and direct the Clerk to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the Department of Corrections for appropriate disciplinary action pursuant to section 944.279, Florida Statutes.

AFFIRMED.

DAVIS, LEWIS and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw