GRANT MASON FOWLER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
This consolidated Anders 1 appeal arises from two separate judgments and sentences. We affirm both judgments and sentences but remand for the trial court to correct the order of revocation of probation in one case and to enter a formal, written order of revocation of probation in the other. In case number 09-260, the *869order fails to specify the new law offenses that led to the revocation of Appellant’s probation. Therefore, it must be corrected. See Nickolas v. State, 66 So.3d 1077, 1077 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (affirming but remanding for entry of a revocation order conforming to the trial court’s oral pronouncements). In case number 09-213, the trial court neglected to enter an order revoking Appellant’s probation, even though the court orally found that Appellant willfully and substantially violated his probation. A formal, written order of revocation is required even when the record clearly reflects the trial court’s intention to revoke probation and its reasons for doing so. See Robinson v. State, 74 So.3d 570, 572 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (recognizing the requirement that the trial court enter a formal, written order of revocation of probation). Based on these considerations, we remand for entry of revocation orders consistent with the trial court’s oral pronouncements in both cases. Appellant need not be present for the correction and entry of the orders. See Nickolas, 66 So.3d at 1077.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
BENTON, C.J., ROWE, and RAY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Certified Windshield v. GEICO Gen. Ins. Co., 264 So. 3d 217 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018)
-
C. T. T. v. State (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)
-
Gary v. State, 90 So. 3d 333 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)…at Appellant willfully and substantially violated condition five of his probation in two ways. Although the court revoked Appellant’s probation, it neglected to enter a formal, written order of revocation. Such an order is required. Fowler v. State, 79 So. 3d 868, 868 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (citing Robinson v. State, 74 So. 3d 570, 572 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)). We, therefore, remand for entry of a revocation order consistent with the trial court’s oral pronouncement. Appellant need not be present for the entry of t…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Robinson v. State, 74 So. 3d 570 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
- Dawson v. State, 66 So. 3d 1077 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
- Nickolas v. State, 66 So. 3d 1077 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)