ANTONIO D. MILLER, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
ANTONIO D. MILLER, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
80 So. 3d 366
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2012)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
DENIED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(A).
BENTON, C.J., CLARK and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Spradley v. Parole Comm'n, 198 So. 3d 642 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)…ight to a-proper parole consideration. Our review of the case law'indicates that courts apply the sword-wielder principle to allow venue in the county where the plaintiffs person or affected property is located. See, e.g., Pinellas Cty. v. Baldwin, 80 So. 3d 366 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (applying sword-wielder exception-to Pinellas County governments taking of landowner’s property in Hillsborough County); Dep’t of Labor & Emp’t Sec. v. Lindquist, 698 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (affirming venue in plaintiffs co…
-
Bd. OF Trs. OF the Internal Improvement Tr. Fund & The Fla. Dep't of Env't Prot. v. Walton Cnty., 121 So. 3d 1166 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)…a. 5th DCA 2006) (emphasis added). Appellants have provided no controlling case law to support their alternative theory, which runs counter to the weight of authority treating this issue as one concerning venue. See, e.g., Pinellas Cnty. v. Baldwin, 80 So. 3d 366 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (affirming the circuit court’s denial of the county’s motion to dismiss the complaint for improper venue, where the property was located in a different county, and because plaintiffs complaint for inverse condemnation invoked the…