ANTONIO D. MILLER, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2012-01-12
No. 1D11-5215
BENTON, C.J., CLARK and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
80 So. 3d 366 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2012) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(A).

BENTON, C.J., CLARK and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Spradley v. Parole Comm'n, 198 So. 3d 642 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)
    …ight to a-proper parole consideration. Our review of the case law'indicates that courts apply the sword-wielder principle to allow venue in the county where the plaintiffs person or affected property is located. See, e.g., Pinellas Cty. v. Baldwin, 80 So. 3d 366 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (applying sword-wielder exception-to Pinellas County governments taking of landowner’s property in Hillsborough County); Dep’t of Labor & Emp’t Sec. v. Lindquist, 698 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (affirming venue in plaintiffs co…
  • …a. 5th DCA 2006) (emphasis added). Appellants have provided no controlling case law to support their alternative theory, which runs counter to the weight of authority treating this issue as one concerning venue. See, e.g., Pinellas Cnty. v. Baldwin, 80 So. 3d 366 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (affirming the circuit court’s denial of the county’s motion to dismiss the complaint for improper venue, where the property was located in a different county, and because plaintiffs complaint for inverse condemnation invoked the…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw