LUIS TORRES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2012-02-14
No. 1D10-4346
THOMAS, MARSTILLER and RAY, JJ., concur.
80 So. 3d 416 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2012) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING OR CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing/Clarification, we grant the requested clarification. Accordingly, the opinion issued on December 8, 2011, is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted in its place.

AFFIRMED. See Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

THOMAS, MARSTILLER and RAY, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Henderson v. State, 149 So. 3d 61 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)
    …hose facts is reviewed de novo. Id. “A warrantless search is per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. . However, a search will be considered lawful if conducted pursuant to consent which was given freely and voluntarily.” Hernandez v. State, 80 So. 3d 416, 419 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (citations omitted). Whether a consent is voluntary is a question of fact to be determined from the totality of the circumstances. Reynolds v. State, 592 So. 2d 1082, 1086 (Fla.1992). “Those circumstances include whether the…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw