WILLIAM A. EVANS, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the petitioner was constructively denied assistance of counsel on appeal and granted his petition for a belated appeal.
The petitioner sought a belated appeal, arguing his appellate counsel was ineffective. The State agreed that the petitioner was constructively denied …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Constructive Denial Of Counsel cases and more on FLexlaw
The petitioner, William Evans, seeks a belated appeal based on his assertion that his appellate counsel was ineffective. We grant the petition.
The petitioner contends that his sentence was technically terminated when the Department of Corrections failed to award him proper jail credit. The trial court agreed and ordered the Department to apply the appropriate credit being sought. Prior to his release from prison, however, the State filed a petition seeking his civil commitment pursuant to the Ryce Act, sections 394.910-.931, Florida Statutes (2010). Mr. Evans then asserted that in accordance with Larimore v. State, 2 So.3d 101 (Fla.2008), the trial court did not have jurisdiction over him for the purposes of the Ryce Act. Thereafter, Mr. Evans agreed to voluntary commitment, but reserved the Larimore issue for appeal.
Mr. Evans then retained private appellate counsel, and indeed an appeal was filed on his behalf. This court, however, dismissed the appeal for failure to prosecute. Mr. Evans now seeks a new appeal based on the ineffective assistance of his appellate counsel. The State admirably agrees that the petitioner was constructively denied any assistance of counsel on appeal, and suggests that the petition should be granted. See Harris v. Day, 226 F.3d 361, 364 (5th Cir.2000).
Accordingly, we grant the petition for belated appeal. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the judgment and sentence in Case No.2006MH-000949, in the Circuit Court in and for Citrus County, Florida. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).
*593PETITION FOR BELATED APPEAL GRANTED.
TORPY and JACOBUS, JJ„ concur.