RICHARD GARNER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2012-02-29
No. 1D12-355
VAN NORTWICK, THOMAS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
82 So. 3d 159 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2012) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. The appellant’s request for a belated appeal is denied. See Powell v. Florida Dept. of Corrections, 727 So.2d 1103 (Fla. 1st DCA1999).

VAN NORTWICK, THOMAS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Johnson v. Omega Ins. Co., 200 So. 3d 1207 (Fla. 2016)
    …, it has, in effect, declined to defend its position in the pending suit. Thus, the payment of the claim is, indeed, the functional equivalent of a confession of judgment or a verdict in favor of the insured.”); Barreto v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 82 So. 3d 159, 162 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (“Here, because the insurer paid the full amounts claimed only after suit was filed, it essentially confessed judgment.”) (emphasis supplied); De Leon v. Great Am. Assur. Co., 78 So. 3d 585, 591-92 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (“[A]ny…
  • …court should award attorney’s fees to an insured pursuant to section 627.428 when it appears as though the insurer ‘would not have paid the insured the proper amount of the loss without judicial intervention.’ ” Barreto v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 82 So. 3d 159, 162 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (quoting Jerkins v. USF & G Specialty Ins. Co., 982 So. 2d 15, 18 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)). The fact that an insurer is the party seeking attorney’s fees under section 627.428 does not, by itself, preclude recovery. Cont’l Cas.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw