TIMOTHY E. WHITE, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Hanson v. Hanson, 217 So. 3d 1165 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)
  …ent income. This is not a situation in which the Husband continues to have income and the possibility of bonuses that he can use to rebuild his retirement accounts after liquidating them to pay the Wife’s attorney’s fees. Compare DiNardo v. DiNardo, 82 So. 3d 1102, 1106 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (noting that because the Husband was still working and had the chance to earn significant bonuses, the final judgment did not truly equalize the parties’ incomes for purposes of determining whether an award of attorney’s fee…
• Hoff v. Hoff, 100 So. 3d 1164 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)
  …ked need. However, the Wife does not argue need and ability to pay; instead she argues that it is inequitable to require her to deplete her assets when the Husband’s assets and income substantially exceed hers. The Wife relies on DiNardo v. DiNardo, 82 So. 3d 1102 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012), which holds that under section 61.16(1), Florida Statutes, “the primary factor to be considered in determining whether to award attorney’s fees and costs to one party is the relative financial resources of the parties.” Id. at 11…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Gibson, 783 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
• Anglia Jacs & Co., Inc. v. Dubin, 783 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)