W.T., APPELLANT,
v.
AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2012-03-19
No. 1D11-3953
BENTON, C.J., WETHERELL, and RAY, JJ., concur.
82 So. 3d 1201 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2012) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with Newsome v. Agency for Persons with Disabilities, 76 So.3d 972 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

BENTON, C.J., WETHERELL, and RAY, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Merriex v. State, 210 So. 3d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)
    …ditions 7 & 6” rather than conditions five and six as alleged in the affidavit of violation and as orally pronounced at the hearing. On remand, the court should enter a corrected order that conforms to its oral pronouncement. See Wilkerson v. State, 82 So. 3d 1201 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). AFFIRMED and REMANDED for correction. OSTERHAUS, JAY, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.…
  • Merriex v. State, 210 So. 3d 757 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)
    …7 & 6” rather than conditions five and six as alleged in the affidavit of violation and as orally pronounced at the hearing. On remand, the court should enter a corrected order that conforms to its oral [*758] pronouncement. See Wilkerson v. State, 82 So. 3d 1201 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). AFFIRMED and REMANDED for correction. OSTERHAUS, JAY, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.…
  • Clark v. State, 275 So. 3d 263 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw